<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Know Your Mac &#8211; Top Ten Secrets of a Power User</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/</link>
	<description>There are peels everywhere...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 20:57:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-496</guid>
		<description>being a recent mac user I am have problems converting to the interface but I&#039;m not ready to give it up yet, I&#039;m sure it will just take me a little time and experimentation. But I haven&#039;t had any experiences that would make me unsatisfied or frustrated, just slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>being a recent mac user I am have problems converting to the interface but I&#8217;m not ready to give it up yet, I&#8217;m sure it will just take me a little time and experimentation. But I haven&#8217;t had any experiences that would make me unsatisfied or frustrated, just slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John doe</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>John doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-482</guid>
		<description>@ Bob
Well said. I dislike fanboys. Own both and than honestly decide. Don&#039;t make up a suggestion if u haven&#039;t even tried the opposition. It&#039;s funny to think how the troll ended up in a Mac article in the first place... Anyways Osx is remarkable. However I&#039;m not to impressed with the sneak peak of &quot;lion&quot;. Hope I&#039;m wrong in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bob<br />
Well said. I dislike fanboys. Own both and than honestly decide. Don&#8217;t make up a suggestion if u haven&#8217;t even tried the opposition. It&#8217;s funny to think how the troll ended up in a Mac article in the first place&#8230; Anyways Osx is remarkable. However I&#8217;m not to impressed with the sneak peak of &#8220;lion&#8221;. Hope I&#8217;m wrong in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-481</guid>
		<description>@Yaro Kasear I don&#039;t see how Windows is more flexible. OS X has Spaces (workspaces like in Linux) and Expose (shows all open windows in a grid, really handy). I consider myself a power user and a geek 100% and I do have a Mac (by power user I mean that I know most of the shortcuts, use expose and spaces to my advantage, almost never use a mouse, and accomplish tasks much quicker than I would&#039;ve done otherwise). Windows 7 and Vista are not superior, they are badly scripted and I do believe that you can accomplish things faster on a Mac, due to the layout of the GUI. If you&#039;re on the desktop and you want to open your Home folder you press shift+command+h can you do that in Windows? No. keeping things organized is also much easier with labels and a non-grid folder structure, meaning you can stack 50 documents on top of each other and delete them and organize them without being restricted to the grid like in other OSes. Well, there&#039;s more choice than you think when it comes to Macs, there are currently 6 different types of Macs tailored at different audiences. In the case of the MBP You can choose your processor- i5 or i7 and speed 2.4, 2.53 or 2.66GHz, screen quality- normal, HD matte or HD glossy, HDD or SDD size etc... If you want customizability like a PC, you&#039;d get a Mac Pro, but for most people, they don&#039;t really need to switch out their harddrive everyday. I consider myself a power user, and even though Macs are overpriced hardware wise, it&#039;s good quality hardware and an amazing OS that if you use long enough and understand how to properly use it, you&#039;ll love it and see why it&#039;s superior. Non-innovation? i completely disagree, get your facts straight, Apple released Mac OS before Bill Gates stole the layout of the OS. OS X is based on NeXTStep OS which is original software whose kernel is UNIX and is based loosely on BSD. True power users would use Macs, the guys that make kernels and operating systems and are hackers/crackers use Linux/BSD they know a shitload of programming languages and are 1337 EVERYWHERE and can do anything they want to. That is not a power user though, that is a person a step higher than that, like a God in the computing world. Most power users that I know use Macs, since Linux doesn&#039;t offer any good software, Linux doesn&#039;t have Photoshop, Final Cut, it&#039;s all crap (GIMP and Kino are shitty like hell) Linux wasn&#039;t meant to be used as a computer with software a la Windows or OS X. Again, OS X is not based on BSD, it&#039;s based on NeXTStep and has the UNIX kernel which the most secure kernel there is, which so happens to also be used by BSD. you either haven&#039;t tried OS X as it&#039;s meant to be used, or you&#039;ve tried OS X long before Leopard or you&#039;re lying. If you learn how to use it properly, it&#039;s the best OS money can buy. Apple provides great tools, included with any new Mac- XCode it has tools to program OS X and iPhone apps. for HTML programming there&#039;s Coda, it&#039;s really great. But, I agree with you on that Linux beats out OS X on developing/programming. This post wasn&#039;t about OS X&gt; Windows, it was about how to be good at working efficiently in OS X. Calling Apple&#039;s logo boring is just hating, and judging logos is a really stupid thing to say. Even I like the Windows logo, but it doesn&#039;t mean that I like Windows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yaro Kasear I don&#8217;t see how Windows is more flexible. OS X has Spaces (workspaces like in Linux) and Expose (shows all open windows in a grid, really handy). I consider myself a power user and a geek 100% and I do have a Mac (by power user I mean that I know most of the shortcuts, use expose and spaces to my advantage, almost never use a mouse, and accomplish tasks much quicker than I would&#8217;ve done otherwise). Windows 7 and Vista are not superior, they are badly scripted and I do believe that you can accomplish things faster on a Mac, due to the layout of the GUI. If you&#8217;re on the desktop and you want to open your Home folder you press shift+command+h can you do that in Windows? No. keeping things organized is also much easier with labels and a non-grid folder structure, meaning you can stack 50 documents on top of each other and delete them and organize them without being restricted to the grid like in other OSes. Well, there&#8217;s more choice than you think when it comes to Macs, there are currently 6 different types of Macs tailored at different audiences. In the case of the MBP You can choose your processor- i5 or i7 and speed 2.4, 2.53 or 2.66GHz, screen quality- normal, HD matte or HD glossy, HDD or SDD size etc&#8230; If you want customizability like a PC, you&#8217;d get a Mac Pro, but for most people, they don&#8217;t really need to switch out their harddrive everyday. I consider myself a power user, and even though Macs are overpriced hardware wise, it&#8217;s good quality hardware and an amazing OS that if you use long enough and understand how to properly use it, you&#8217;ll love it and see why it&#8217;s superior. Non-innovation? i completely disagree, get your facts straight, Apple released Mac OS before Bill Gates stole the layout of the OS. OS X is based on NeXTStep OS which is original software whose kernel is UNIX and is based loosely on BSD. True power users would use Macs, the guys that make kernels and operating systems and are hackers/crackers use Linux/BSD they know a shitload of programming languages and are 1337 EVERYWHERE and can do anything they want to. That is not a power user though, that is a person a step higher than that, like a God in the computing world. Most power users that I know use Macs, since Linux doesn&#8217;t offer any good software, Linux doesn&#8217;t have Photoshop, Final Cut, it&#8217;s all crap (GIMP and Kino are shitty like hell) Linux wasn&#8217;t meant to be used as a computer with software a la Windows or OS X. Again, OS X is not based on BSD, it&#8217;s based on NeXTStep and has the UNIX kernel which the most secure kernel there is, which so happens to also be used by BSD. you either haven&#8217;t tried OS X as it&#8217;s meant to be used, or you&#8217;ve tried OS X long before Leopard or you&#8217;re lying. If you learn how to use it properly, it&#8217;s the best OS money can buy. Apple provides great tools, included with any new Mac- XCode it has tools to program OS X and iPhone apps. for HTML programming there&#8217;s Coda, it&#8217;s really great. But, I agree with you on that Linux beats out OS X on developing/programming. This post wasn&#8217;t about OS X&gt; Windows, it was about how to be good at working efficiently in OS X. Calling Apple&#8217;s logo boring is just hating, and judging logos is a really stupid thing to say. Even I like the Windows logo, but it doesn&#8217;t mean that I like Windows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaro Kasear</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaro Kasear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-480</guid>
		<description>@Bob - I didn&#039;t say anything about Windows.

And no, Mac OS X is NOT more powerful than Windows when it actually comes to flexibility and things a power user wants. However, Windows is negligibly superior to OS X in the power user category to the point a power user needs. Both OS X and Windows suck for power users, no matter how much bloggers in Mac sites (Which already pretty much make their bias obvious.) like to claim otherwise.

Macs, the computers, themselves are piss-poor choices for power users, as they don&#039;t offer the same modularity or choice of a standard PC. And, sadly, the same hardware for the same quality in a PC is MUCH cheaper, and true power users figure out within moments that Macs are NOT worth their price tag in hardware or software, especially given all of what Macs today are based off of in hardware and software. Apple&#039;s non-innovation strikes again.

No, true power users will use a typical PC. Not necessarily one that&#039;s high-end, but one that can at least be considered reasonable.

And they don&#039;t use Windows. Or OS X. Not true power users because both OS X are severely LACKING in what a power user actually wants in an operating system.

Talk to a true power user, and ask what they use. It will be BSD or Linux. Granted, OS X is based on BSD, Apple&#039;s corrupted it enough in OS X for it not to truly matter anymore or to deliver the power of BSD that a power user would want. Face facts. I say this as a genuine power user: I wouldn&#039;t want to use OS X or Windows, because I&#039;ve used both and I can tell you, you&#039;ll want to stay far away as a power user from those two.

Same goes for programming. Apple provides some sorry tools for serious programmers, Microsoft provides a semi-decent IDE, but again, Linux beats them both out in this category.

Don&#039;t bother trying to say this blog is objective, what with it actually BEING a Mac website with Apple&#039;s boring logo emblazoned everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob &#8211; I didn&#8217;t say anything about Windows.</p>
<p>And no, Mac OS X is NOT more powerful than Windows when it actually comes to flexibility and things a power user wants. However, Windows is negligibly superior to OS X in the power user category to the point a power user needs. Both OS X and Windows suck for power users, no matter how much bloggers in Mac sites (Which already pretty much make their bias obvious.) like to claim otherwise.</p>
<p>Macs, the computers, themselves are piss-poor choices for power users, as they don&#8217;t offer the same modularity or choice of a standard PC. And, sadly, the same hardware for the same quality in a PC is MUCH cheaper, and true power users figure out within moments that Macs are NOT worth their price tag in hardware or software, especially given all of what Macs today are based off of in hardware and software. Apple&#8217;s non-innovation strikes again.</p>
<p>No, true power users will use a typical PC. Not necessarily one that&#8217;s high-end, but one that can at least be considered reasonable.</p>
<p>And they don&#8217;t use Windows. Or OS X. Not true power users because both OS X are severely LACKING in what a power user actually wants in an operating system.</p>
<p>Talk to a true power user, and ask what they use. It will be BSD or Linux. Granted, OS X is based on BSD, Apple&#8217;s corrupted it enough in OS X for it not to truly matter anymore or to deliver the power of BSD that a power user would want. Face facts. I say this as a genuine power user: I wouldn&#8217;t want to use OS X or Windows, because I&#8217;ve used both and I can tell you, you&#8217;ll want to stay far away as a power user from those two.</p>
<p>Same goes for programming. Apple provides some sorry tools for serious programmers, Microsoft provides a semi-decent IDE, but again, Linux beats them both out in this category.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t bother trying to say this blog is objective, what with it actually BEING a Mac website with Apple&#8217;s boring logo emblazoned everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-479</guid>
		<description>@Yaro Kasear Not true, OS X  is more suitable to power users than Windows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yaro Kasear Not true, OS X  is more suitable to power users than Windows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaro Kasear</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaro Kasear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-468</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mac power user.&quot;

Oxymoron.

REAL power users just plain don&#039;t use Macs. Largely because Macs do next to nothing a power user would actually want.

Up there with &quot;real geeks don&#039;t buy Apple.&quot; It just doesn&#039;t occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mac power user.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oxymoron.</p>
<p>REAL power users just plain don&#8217;t use Macs. Largely because Macs do next to nothing a power user would actually want.</p>
<p>Up there with &#8220;real geeks don&#8217;t buy Apple.&#8221; It just doesn&#8217;t occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spud.upb</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>spud.upb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-465</guid>
		<description>As I always launch the same programs when I come into work I have made a really simple applescript that will launch them for me in the morning and then one that will quit them all at the end of the day.  Simply open up the Applescript Editor and, for launching, use:

tell application &quot;application name&quot;
    activate
end tell
for example:
tell application &quot;Mail&quot;
    activate
end tell

to quit use:
tell application &quot;application name&quot;
    quit
end tell

Simply put those lines in for every application that you want to launch or quit, respectively, and then choose File --&gt; Save As --&gt; and save it as an application.  You can then drag it to the dock and launch/close everything with one click.
I also map network drives and other such customizations, but that might be getting a little too in depth for most new to applescript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I always launch the same programs when I come into work I have made a really simple applescript that will launch them for me in the morning and then one that will quit them all at the end of the day.  Simply open up the Applescript Editor and, for launching, use:</p>
<p>tell application &#8220;application name&#8221;<br />
    activate<br />
end tell<br />
for example:<br />
tell application &#8220;Mail&#8221;<br />
    activate<br />
end tell</p>
<p>to quit use:<br />
tell application &#8220;application name&#8221;<br />
    quit<br />
end tell</p>
<p>Simply put those lines in for every application that you want to launch or quit, respectively, and then choose File &#8211;&gt; Save As &#8211;&gt; and save it as an application.  You can then drag it to the dock and launch/close everything with one click.<br />
I also map network drives and other such customizations, but that might be getting a little too in depth for most new to applescript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wacek Jedrzejczak</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Wacek Jedrzejczak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-293</guid>
		<description>As I turn off my computer overnight and for a large part of the day, I have been using Anacron to run automatic OS X 10.5.x maintenance in the past. The results could be checked in file /var/log/ where the daily out, monthly out and weekly out run times appeared.

When I have downloaded the latest Anacron 3.3 it told me:

&quot;This version has been updated with a Universal binary for both PPC and Intel architectures. It will run on Leopard (MacOS 10.5), but is not needed because the Leopard launched will correctly run skipped events when the machine is next awake.&quot; 

As Anacron 3.3 stopped running, I have completely uninstalled it in accordance with Anacron&#039;s instructions but I can&#039;t find any records of Leopard&#039;s running automatic maintenance in /var/log/ .
Does that mean that the maintenance is not running or that it is no longer listed in /var/log/? Is it listed anywhere at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I turn off my computer overnight and for a large part of the day, I have been using Anacron to run automatic OS X 10.5.x maintenance in the past. The results could be checked in file /var/log/ where the daily out, monthly out and weekly out run times appeared.</p>
<p>When I have downloaded the latest Anacron 3.3 it told me:</p>
<p>&#8220;This version has been updated with a Universal binary for both PPC and Intel architectures. It will run on Leopard (MacOS 10.5), but is not needed because the Leopard launched will correctly run skipped events when the machine is next awake.&#8221; </p>
<p>As Anacron 3.3 stopped running, I have completely uninstalled it in accordance with Anacron&#8217;s instructions but I can&#8217;t find any records of Leopard&#8217;s running automatic maintenance in /var/log/ .<br />
Does that mean that the maintenance is not running or that it is no longer listed in /var/log/? Is it listed anywhere at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wacek Jedrzejczak</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Wacek Jedrzejczak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-292</guid>
		<description>As I turn off my computer overnight and for a large part of the day, I have been using Anacron to run automatic OS X 10.5.x maintenance in the past. The results could be checked in file /var/log/ where the daily out, monthly out and weekly out run times appeared.

When I have downloaded the latest Anacron 3.3 it told me:

&quot;This version has been updated with a Universal binary for both PPC and Intel architectures. It will run on Leopard (MacOS 10.5), but is not needed because the Leopard launched will correctly run skipped events when the machine is next awake.&quot; 

As Anacron 3.3 stopped running, I have completely uninstalled it in accordance with Anacron&#039;s instructions but I can&#039;t find any records of Leopard&#039;s running automatic maintenance in /var/log/ .
Does that mean that the maintenance is not running or that it is no longer listed in /var/log/? Is it listed anywhere at all?
Wacek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I turn off my computer overnight and for a large part of the day, I have been using Anacron to run automatic OS X 10.5.x maintenance in the past. The results could be checked in file /var/log/ where the daily out, monthly out and weekly out run times appeared.</p>
<p>When I have downloaded the latest Anacron 3.3 it told me:</p>
<p>&#8220;This version has been updated with a Universal binary for both PPC and Intel architectures. It will run on Leopard (MacOS 10.5), but is not needed because the Leopard launched will correctly run skipped events when the machine is next awake.&#8221; </p>
<p>As Anacron 3.3 stopped running, I have completely uninstalled it in accordance with Anacron&#8217;s instructions but I can&#8217;t find any records of Leopard&#8217;s running automatic maintenance in /var/log/ .<br />
Does that mean that the maintenance is not running or that it is no longer listed in /var/log/? Is it listed anywhere at all?<br />
Wacek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://macmembrane.com/know-your-mac-top-ten-secrets-of-a-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macmembrane.com/?p=533#comment-241</guid>
		<description>how to be a mac power user: Stop using macs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to be a mac power user: Stop using macs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

